Monday, January 17, 2022

An ETF giving 40% pa CAGR. You dare?

 It was the class gathering that only the most successful was most keen to go. 

First the sound of a Maserati. 

Next, she walked in with a swagger, armed with a Himalaya Birkin. 

The girl who consistently did the worst in class. That girl who got the lowest paying first job and now no job. That invisible girl. 

She sat quietly at the corner (as usual), unbeknownst to everyone except me. The Alphas were having a field day, with their identities tied to their jobs, they unleashed a torrent of stories about their work life and which enrichment classes they have been sending their kids to.

The last class gathering was in 2010. The now class gathering is in 2021.

I sat beside her and humbly asked her. 

"Can share?"

"I had nothing to lose. I whacked the UPRO ETF. I was lucky."

The UPRO ETF incepted in 2009. 

It had a price of around USD$2.50 then. Now, it's price is USD$147. 

A staggering compounded annual growth rate ( CAGR) of 40% pa.


The UPRO ETF is a leveraged fund and it seeks to 3x the return of its underlying benchmark (target) for a single day. The underlying benchmark is the S&P500.

Comparing SPY ( another etf which mirrors the S&P500 without any leverage) to UPRO ETF, SPY sucks!

After reading up on UPRO ETF, i realized this girl has balls of steel, having experienced through one of the most volatile investing instrument.

You see, what happened between 2009 and 2011, masked by the beautiful CAGR was terrifying. 





Volatility Decay

Assuming the underlying benchmark starts with 100. It falls to 80. That is a 20% drop. 

For it to rise back to 100, it has to increase by 25% now. 

Let's compare the effect of volatility decay between the benchmark fund and the corresponding 3X leveraged fund.

Both start at 100.

At Day 7, the benchmark is back at 100. Since the 3X leveraged fund seeks to "return" 3X the benchmark return for a single day, on Day 7, it has become 34.3.

That is volatility decay in action. 

This girl is pretty lucky and she knew it. 

She would have lost money if in the long run :

1) The market is flat and is volatile

2) The market goes down and is volatile

3) The market goes up slowly and is volatile

It seems the S&P 500 has been going up very steadily and not very volatile for her.

I am indeed happy for her and shared my observations.

" Oh i didn't think about that, thanks, i have made enough, will be transferring to SPY. "

And handed me a hulk. "You want? No box and cert. Free"

Monday, January 10, 2022

How does your asset allocation compare with others in Singapore

The household networth in Singapore has grown at a rate of about 6.5% pa from 1995 to 2021. Compared with the general inflation of about 2-3% pa, we are not too shabby. No wonder property prices keep rising!

How has the asset allocation change over the years as the country becomes even more developed and the population get more aged? 

What are some trends we can observe?

Over the years, the allocation to property has been reducing.

Allocation to life insurance has been increasing.

Allocation to CPF has been increasing.

Allocation to currency and deposits has been increasing.

How does your asset allocation compare?

2021

2010

1995
Source: Data.gov.sg

There looks like much money on the sidelines ( CPF and currency  & deposits). 

Figure 4

On a whole, is there much distress in the property market?

The amount of mortgage loans to household networth seems to be pretty healthy and having a downward trend.