In behaviourial finance, one of the fallacies of investors is to suffer from an anchoring effect. The concept of anchoring draws on the tendency to attach or "anchor" our thoughts to a reference point - even though it may have no logical relevance to the decision at hand. For example, some investors invest in the stocks of companies that have fallen considerably in a very short amount of time. In this case, the investor is anchoring on a recent "high" that the stock has achieved and consequently believes that the drop in price provides an opportunity to buy the stock at a discount. See below of an experiment. Taken from a University Research paper:
Quote
In a 1974 paper entitled "Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics And Biases", Kahneman and Tversky conducted a study in which a wheel containing the numbers 1 though 100 was spun. Then, subjects were asked whether the percentage of U.N. membership accounted for by African countries was higher or lower than the number on the wheel. Afterward, the subjects were asked to give an actual estimate. Tversky and Kahneman found that the seemingly random anchoring value of the number on which the wheel landed had a pronounced effect on the answer that the subjects gave. For example, when the wheel landed on 10, the average estimate given by the subjects was 25%, whereas when the wheel landed on 60, the average estimate was 45%. As you can see, the random number had an anchoring effect on the subjects' responses, pulling their estimates closer to the number they were just shown - even though the number had absolutely no correlation at all to the question. UnQuote
In order to best avoid the anchoring effect, one has to use a calculator and determine a value. We decided to use Benjamin Graham's formula to determine that value. This value will then serve as a benchmark from which we anchor our investing decisions. We apologised to The SEXY Victoria Junior College student and bought her a Macdonalds Happy Meal with a Madagascar Giraffe ( Moooov it). She also made us sing the Victorian Anthem and she said we have to put the Victorian badge on our site. ( Whats with her and Victoria???????!!!) She was so happy that she volunteered to help us crunch some numbers. This is shown below. So you see my friend, stocks are just cheaper. They are still not cheap! ( We are not saying the market has not seen the lowest yet. Don't mistake us cos we don't know. We are just saying cheapness based on Benjamin's valuation. See our post on How to Value Equities using Benjamin Graham's Simple Formula.)
(We want to add that above is not our portfolio. We have positions in some of them though. So pls pls use a calculator, go to reuters or bloomberg and deduce the value for yourself. A the VJC student said " Don't be a Cow". )
Important: The objective of the articles in this blog is to set you thinking about the company before you invest your hard-earned money. Do not invest solely based on this article. Unlike House or Instituitional Analysts who have to maintain relations with corporations due to investment banking relations, generating commissions,e.t.c, SGDividends say things as it is, factually. Unlike Analyst who have to be "uptight" and "cheem", we make it simplified and cheapskate. -The Vigilante Investor, SGDividends Team
err ..is there a link to the table ? ... fonts very small to see ... thanks : )
ReplyDeleteHi Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteWe will try to put up a larger pic. ( later today)
BTW, Do you know how to link it to a file using Blogspot?
If you know , let us know, we will put up a PDF file link if possible.
Very gd n informative site for a financial idiot like me...keep up the good work team!
ReplyDeleteHey to the first Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteWe tried to increase the font in Excel and reloaded it. It seems it is only marginally better.
Actually ALL the figures are in 3 decimal places. But we closed the width of the columns so under Diluted Earnings Per Share, it all shows 1 decimal place.
We are currently calculating more companies intrinsic value ( currently at 40 companies done) and we will upload it on this site for investors to get rid of last year's ANCHORING effect.
Don't take it at face value cos again this is SGDividends opinions. =)
May I make a suggestion, just right click and save the picture as a jpeg file and then you can enlarge and see it.
ReplyDeleteRegards
V
Hi V,
ReplyDeleteOk thats a good idea...haha.. why didnt we think of that!
ok i see it by right clicking and viewing it enlarged ..
ReplyDeletejust sharing a trivia: i don't know about putting pictures on blogs but i know that u can upload to a hosting site (photobucket or tinypic.com ) and paste the link/the pic using the code into the blog ..
the 'first Anonymous' : )
For the record , thanks for all ur sharing.
ReplyDeleteI am learning a lot ,especially on FA in here.
Your style oozes with confidence .
Keep up the good work !
the 'first Anonymous' : )
Roger that "first Anonymous" that will be helpful. =).
ReplyDeletei assume you know how to screen capture (the button on the right after the F12 on the keyboard)
ReplyDeletescreen capture the spreadsheet
paste on the paint
save it as jpeg or gif file
upload to hosting site (photobucket.com,tinypic.com etc)
incorporate the url or the IMG into the blog
i hope i got this right ...
the 'first Anonymous ' : )
Hi First Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteYup, thats what we have been doing to upload into this site for the above very very small table you mentioned.
Will try it for our upcoming list of 40+ SGX stocks =) this photobucket thingy..maybe flickr also can..will try. Thanks!
Hi SGDividends,
ReplyDeleteI tried to follow your method in the previous post to get the diluted EPS exclud extraord from Reuters but the numbers dun seem to match with yours. For instance:
Tathong's: http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/incomeStatement?stmtType=INC&symbol=TAT.SI
Sembcorp's:
http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/incomeStatement?stmtType=INC&perType=INT&symbol=SCIL.SI
From your table, it seems that it is worth investing in Tat hong cos its current share price is very much less than the intrinsic value. :)
Keep up the good work and thanks! =)
K
Hi Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteDid you click on the ANNUAL button? Cos you may be looking at the Quarter results.
We just checked and its similar. Guess its cos we round it up to 2 decimals.
Check again and ask us if you have further queries!
Oh! Thanks! =)
ReplyDeleteK
In current market environment, I prefer to trade FX. Maybe there is value in stocks, but I want to see real profits.
ReplyDeleteIn FX trading, I see real profit: http://www.forexandbinary.com/
If your readers are interested in FX trading, send an email to me at metal.commodity@gmail.com.